U.S. Geological Survey home page

USGS Spectral Library Version 7 Sample Description

Kokaly, R.F., Clark, R.N., Swayze, G.A., Livo, K.E., Hoefen, T.M., Pearson, N.C., Wise, R.A., Benzel, W.M., Lowers, H.A., Driscoll, R.L., and Klein, A.J., 2017, USGS Spectral Library Version 7: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 1035, 61 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ds1035
For more information on the library, see: local link web link

TITLE: Vermiculite GDS836 expanded DESCRIPT

DOCUMENTATION_FORMAT: Man_Made

SAMPLE_ID: GDS836

MATERIAL_TYPE: Expaned Phyllosilicates

MATERIAL: Expanded Vermiculite Ore

FORMULA: (Mg,Fe2+,Al)3(Si,Al)4O10(OH)2.4H2O

FORMULA_HTML: (Mg,Fe2+,Al)3(Si,Al)4O10(OH)2.4H2O

COLLECTION_LOCALITY: This sample came from a bag of DESA® Heating vermiculite purchased in the Denver, Colorado area around 2008.

ORIGINAL_DONOR:

CURRENT_SAMPLE_LOCATION: USGS Denver, CO

ULTIMATE_SAMPLE_LOCATION: USGS Denver, CO

SAMPLE_DESCRIPTION:

The sample has a mottled golden color with a few dark grains. Grains range in size from 2 – 10 mm (Fig. GDS836.photo.1).

A modified Cincinnati floation method was carried out on this sample. The sink fraction consists of mica flakes and small particles that were mounted on a stub for SEM examination.

The source of this expanded vermiculite is unknown, as it does not match the composition or spectrum of domestic vermiculites. It is from an unknown source.

Original spectrum published in:

IMAGE_OF_SAMPLE:
Photo of sample

END_SAMPLE_DESCRIPTION.

XRD_ANALYSIS:

No XRD analysis is available for this sample.

END_XRD_ANALYSIS.

COMPOSITIONAL_ANALYSIS_TYPE: None # XRF, EPMA, ICP(Trace), WChem

COMPOSITION_TRACE: None

COMPOSITION_DISCUSSION:

The sample was examined with probe microanalysis. Spot analyses plot in a tight cluster centered near the upper left boarder of the Libby field on the Al/Ti versus Al/[Mg/(Mg+Fe)] diagram (Fig. GDS836.microprobe.1). About a third of the spot analyses plot outside of the Libby field with a few points plotting just inside the neighboring Palabora field (Fig. GDS836.microprobe.1).

END_COMPOSITION_DISCUSSION.

MICROSCOPIC_EXAMINATION:

The sample was examined with SEM and Energy dispersive spectroscopy. Particles from the sink fraction were placed on an SEM stub, which was coated with carbon, and examined under high magnification. Points analyzed with EDS are shown in color on SEM micrographs that accompany the EDS spectra. Numerous elongate compositionally <93>Libby-like<94> amphibole and tremolite particles were detected with EDS and SEM analyses (e.g., Figs. GDS836.EDS.1 and 2, and Fig. GDS836.SEM.1). The elongate amphibole particles in this sample are notably less elongate (i.e., they are byssolite like) than those in vermiculite samples from Libby, Montana (compare with Figs. at1UI.SEM.1, GDS332.SEM.2, GDS652.SEM.2, GDS653.SEM.1, and GDS701.SEM.2).

END_MICROSCOPIC_EXAMINATION.

SPECTROSCOPIC_DISCUSSION:

The spectrum is typical for a sample with predominately hydrobiotite and phlogopite/biotite. The 1.40/1.42 micron band depth ratio plots above the “no detectable amphibole, talc, and serpentine” line in Figures GDS836.spectrum.2 and 3. The reflectance spectrum of this sample does not have a detectable 2.24-micron band so there is no symbol on Fig. GDS836.spectrum.4. The spectral parameters plot in the Mixtures field (Figs. GDS836.spectrum.2 and 3).

SPECTRAL_PURITY: 1b2_3_4_ # 1= 0.2-3, 2= 1.5-6, 3= 6-25, 4= 20-150 microns